Which statement about integrated plan coordination across subprojects is true?

Which statement about integrated plan coordination across subprojects is true?

• A. It coordinates progress, dependencies, and risk status across all subprojects.
• B. It focuses only on budget for the parent project.
• C. It tracks only procurement activities.
• D. It excludes dependencies between subprojects.

Answer: (A)

Coordinating across subprojects means maintaining an integrated view that shows how work is progressing, where dependencies lie, and what risks affect the entire set of subprojects. This unified view lets management see how delays, blockages, or risks in one subproject impact others and the overall project schedule, so appropriate adjustments can be made across all subprojects. The best statement captures this breadth: it coordinates progress, dependencies, and risk status across all subprojects. That reflects the core purpose of integrated plan coordination—keeping the whole program aligned and informed. Focusing only on budget is too narrow; overseeing financials alone doesn’t address how subprojects interrelate. Tracking only procurement misses the broader integration of schedules and risks. Excluding dependencies would defeat the purpose of coordination, since understanding and managing how subprojects depend on one another is essential to a cohesive plan.

Coordinating across subprojects means maintaining an integrated view that shows how work is progressing, where dependencies lie, and what risks affect the entire set of subprojects. This unified view lets management see how delays, blockages, or risks in one subproject impact others and the overall project schedule, so appropriate adjustments can be made across all subprojects.

The best statement captures this breadth: it coordinates progress, dependencies, and risk status across all subprojects. That reflects the core purpose of integrated plan coordination—keeping the whole program aligned and informed.

Focusing only on budget is too narrow; overseeing financials alone doesn’t address how subprojects interrelate. Tracking only procurement misses the broader integration of schedules and risks. Excluding dependencies would defeat the purpose of coordination, since understanding and managing how subprojects depend on one another is essential to a cohesive plan.